What is a common outcome when there is a violation of time constraints regarding an RVR?

When there is a violation of time constraints concerning a Rule Violation Report (RVR), one significant outcome is that the inmate’s time credit forfeiture may be barred. This is because the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has established specific time frames for processing RVRs to ensure that due process is upheld and that inmates are not unfairly punished due to administrative delays. If these time limits are not adhered to, it can lead to a ruling that undermines the validity of the sanctions imposed on the inmate, including the forfeiture of time credits. Thus, barring the forfeiture serves to protect the rights of the inmate and maintain the integrity of the disciplinary process in line with established legal standards.

The other options do not accurately reflect the standard procedures or outcomes related to violations of time constraints in the RVR process. For instance, expediting the hearing would contradict the purpose of addressing time violations, and dismissing charges outright may not be universally applicable to all situations of delay. Additionally, while a secondary investigation could be warranted in some scenarios, it does not specifically address the repercussions of failing to meet time constraints regarding the RVR process.